<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The iPhone&#8217;s Real Significance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robinontech.com/2007/02/12/the-iphones-real-significance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robinontech.com/2007/02/12/the-iphones-real-significance/</link>
	<description>Technology Commentary &#038; Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:48:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.robinontech.com/2007/02/12/the-iphones-real-significance/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robinontech.com/2007/02/12/the-iphones-real-significance/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>since the iPhone is wifi-enabled, there may be less of a benefit to Cingular for data-service revenue than one may think -- presumably one wouldn&#039;t *always* need the carrier&#039;s network to access the web, or send emails, etc. plus, if you&#039;re not going through the carrier&#039;s walled-garden web-browser, the carrier loses eyeballs for their (newly planted) ad placements. 

furthermore, revenue derived from purchase of music OTA (or through carrier store online) would seem to be eliminated because of synching with iTunes. will Cingular get a cut of iTunes sales for music going onto an iPhone? not likely. would someone choose to buy music from a Cingular store instead of iTunes? even less likely. 

if the iPhone doesn&#039;t require users to purchase other data products (backgrounds/wallpapers, ringtones) through the carrier&#039;s store, insead allowing one to access for free on the web (or through a third party), this doesn&#039;t do much for Cingular either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since the iPhone is wifi-enabled, there may be less of a benefit to Cingular for data-service revenue than one may think &#8212; presumably one wouldn&#8217;t *always* need the carrier&#8217;s network to access the web, or send emails, etc. plus, if you&#8217;re not going through the carrier&#8217;s walled-garden web-browser, the carrier loses eyeballs for their (newly planted) ad placements. </p>
<p>furthermore, revenue derived from purchase of music OTA (or through carrier store online) would seem to be eliminated because of synching with iTunes. will Cingular get a cut of iTunes sales for music going onto an iPhone? not likely. would someone choose to buy music from a Cingular store instead of iTunes? even less likely. </p>
<p>if the iPhone doesn&#8217;t require users to purchase other data products (backgrounds/wallpapers, ringtones) through the carrier&#8217;s store, insead allowing one to access for free on the web (or through a third party), this doesn&#8217;t do much for Cingular either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beanspants1</title>
		<link>http://www.robinontech.com/2007/02/12/the-iphones-real-significance/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>beanspants1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robinontech.com/2007/02/12/the-iphones-real-significance/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>The cut they are asking for is insignifant (i know how much it is, i&#039;m not saying the point is insignificant), compared to the advertising, support, and everything else that apple is putting into the device. 

not only that, they are, in effect, subsidizing for cingular, the development of code which allows a manufacturer a cut of subscriber revenue based on product.  you can see why a carrier wouldn&#039;t build this for themself and put it out -- the manufacturers are more than happy to spend next to zero (in the US market at least) on advertising and receive the subsidies in exchange for a pissant exclusivity clause, and lawyerly business lunches are cheaper than development.     


anyways, if this thing takes off, for Cingular at least, it will signify the beginning of the end of cell phone subsidies - the manufacturers will also have to start pushing their products themselves in conjunction with the carriers, and fighting for bigger percents of revenue based on device popularity. 
the carriers will only cover the service costs. 

so with all that being said, i have a hard time believing that verizon honestly passed on this -their MBAs aren&#039;t that shortsighted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cut they are asking for is insignifant (i know how much it is, i&#8217;m not saying the point is insignificant), compared to the advertising, support, and everything else that apple is putting into the device. </p>
<p>not only that, they are, in effect, subsidizing for cingular, the development of code which allows a manufacturer a cut of subscriber revenue based on product.  you can see why a carrier wouldn&#8217;t build this for themself and put it out &#8212; the manufacturers are more than happy to spend next to zero (in the US market at least) on advertising and receive the subsidies in exchange for a pissant exclusivity clause, and lawyerly business lunches are cheaper than development.     </p>
<p>anyways, if this thing takes off, for Cingular at least, it will signify the beginning of the end of cell phone subsidies &#8211; the manufacturers will also have to start pushing their products themselves in conjunction with the carriers, and fighting for bigger percents of revenue based on device popularity.<br />
the carriers will only cover the service costs. </p>
<p>so with all that being said, i have a hard time believing that verizon honestly passed on this -their MBAs aren&#8217;t that shortsighted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annette</title>
		<link>http://www.robinontech.com/2007/02/12/the-iphones-real-significance/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>annette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robinontech.com/2007/02/12/the-iphones-real-significance/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>How refreshing to find a blog which is extremely intelligent, informative and well written. Your article on iphones was a real eye opener. Well done, I look forward to more....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How refreshing to find a blog which is extremely intelligent, informative and well written. Your article on iphones was a real eye opener. Well done, I look forward to more&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.828 seconds -->
